80 official recommendations and 4 separate civic proposals.
Public Accountability Dashboard
Monitoring progress on electoral reform commitments through a static public tracker.
This page is not database-driven yet. It is designed as a professional public dashboard that groups the official 80 recommendations and highlights the four civic proposals as priority tracker cards.
No item is marked implemented without clear public evidence.
Used where formal activity or implementation steps are clearly visible.
Used where the agenda exists but stronger public evidence is still needed.
Completed with clear official evidence.
Implementation has started but is not yet complete.
Authorities are considering or discussing next steps.
No verifiable public implementation action identified yet.
Four civic proposals presented as high-visibility accountability cards.
These are separate from the official 80 and are shown here because they speak directly to justice, reintegration, civic freedom, and democratic stability.
Release of citizens detained for expressing political views
Lead institutions: Judiciary, Ministry of Justice, and security institutions
Evidence standard: Court ruling, detainee release, or official directive
This proposal speaks directly to civic freedom and trust in democratic institutions.
Review and discontinuation of politically motivated cases
Lead institutions: Judiciary, Attorney General, and Ministry of Justice
Evidence standard: Case review, charges withdrawn, or court decision issued
Fair legal processes reinforce confidence in justice and support national unity.
Safe return and reintegration of displaced citizens and supporters
Lead institutions: Government, local authorities, and security institutions
Evidence standard: Public announcement, safe return evidence, or reintegration programme
Reintegration supports social stability, healing, and longer-term democratic calm.
Institutionalised dialogue between political parties and national stakeholders
Lead institutions: Political parties, governance institutions, and mediating bodies
Evidence standard: Dialogue meeting held, mediation body established, or joint statement issued
Regular dialogue reduces tension and helps sustain peaceful governance.
Grouped progress on the official 80 recommendations.
To keep the tracker practical and readable, the official recommendations are monitored here by reform group rather than expanded into 80 individual dashboard cards.
Electoral Commission transparency and operations
Lead institutions: Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone
Operational planning, transparency, staffing policies, and access arrangements remain core reform areas.
Voter information, registration, and nomination systems
Lead institutions: Electoral Commission for Sierra Leone
These items require stronger public education systems and more visible operational preparation.
Institutional oversight and electoral security
Lead institutions: Parliament, oversight bodies, and security institutions
These reforms involve structures, mandates, monitoring systems, and public transparency around security and oversight.
Constitutional and appointment reforms
Lead institutions: Parliament, Ministry of Justice, and constitutional actors
This group includes appointment structures, eligibility rules, observer protections, and constitutional amendments.
Election administration and inclusion
Lead institutions: Electoral Commission, Parliament, and PPRC
This group covers inclusion, register management, polling access, campaign rules, and campaign finance reform.
Dispute resolution, integrity, media, and implementation
Lead institutions: Government, Parliament, SLBC, IMC, and related institutions
This group captures petitions, integrity safeguards, media reform, national dialogue, and implementation follow-through.
