Why this separation matters
Keeping divergence separate protects the integrity of the official report while giving the public a clear way to understand unsettled issues that still shape national confidence.
Documented areas where parties did not reach consensus, presented separately from the official 80 recommendations.
This page keeps divergence distinct from the agreed reform package and focuses on peaceful civic understanding, lawful resolution, public confidence, and responsible national dialogue.
Keeping divergence separate protects the integrity of the official report while giving the public a clear way to understand unsettled issues that still shape national confidence.
ONE SALONE supports peaceful, lawful, responsible engagement that reduces tension, preserves national calm, and encourages solutions rooted in justice and democratic legitimacy.
These issues continue to matter because they touch public trust, reconciliation, access to credible information, and the wider democratic climate in Sierra Leone.
One party maintained that the announced election results lacked credibility and required further verification, while the other held that the declared results were lawful and valid. No consensus was reached.
One party called for release of full polling-station-level data for independent verification, while the other argued existing procedures were sufficient and future reforms would address transparency concerns.
One party argued that certain post-election detainees should be treated as political prisoners and released as part of reconciliation, while the other maintained their cases should proceed through the judicial system.
One party proposed a rerun of the election under independent or regional supervision, while the other maintained the declared outcome was final and did not justify a rerun.